The Novel Jackson's Dilemma's Group Dynamics
The novel Jackson's Dilemma is about a group of friends who come from wealthy families. The story begins with all of the friends gathered in a circle discussing an upcoming wedding. The wedding features Edward, a polite and attractive young man, and Marian, a lovely young lady. The day before the wedding, the group is conducting a critical analysis of the event. It is the final stage of preparation to ensure that everything goes as planned (Murdoch, 1996). During the finalization, an unknown person drops a note stating that Marian has left. Marian had cancelled the wedding and had mysteriously vanished, according to the note. Marian's disappearance sends the group on a chaotic odyssey as everyone tries to figure out where Marian has gone. The search for Marian leads them to numerous discoveries about others, themselves, and the nature of beings.
The search for Marian continues for some time without yielding any results. Friends work together by ringing each other and sharing information about the search
s progress best essay writing services reddit confirms their support (Murdoch, 1996). According to the book, all of the friends are deeply affected by the disappearance and are unable to console one another (Forsyth, 1990). In some cases, some group members are hesitant to conduct the search because the other members will continue the search.
The author also introduces Jackson, who serves as the master of ceremonies at this event. He appears as a calm man who was once homeless but is now a foreman on a large estate. Despite his apparent simplicity, Jackson appears to be the most helpful character in the entire story (Murdoch, 1996). While the rest of his friends are unsure what to do, Jackson is unsure how to assist each of them in overcoming the situation. As the story progresses, Jackson appears mysterious as he employs his skills to assist the group members in dealing with the situation. He is the group's unifying factor, and the search is entirely dependent on him.
Group Methodologies
Several group processes emerge throughout the story as issues concerning Marian's disappearance emerge. The group processes are most visible in how the various characters in the group react to the news of Marian's disappearance. Furthermore, different group processes emerge as a result of how several characters in the group deal with the problem. Finally, Jackson's efforts to assist all of the group members in dealing with the situation depict group processes.
Think in Groups
Group think is openly manifested throughout the story. The group is first informed of the cancelled wedding as the story begins. This information reached the group as final preparations were being made (Murdoch, 1996). The discovery of the mysterious note puts the group in a bind, and no one is willing to make the first move. Marian would have been found if the group had acted quickly, according to the author. It took some time for the group to come to an agreement on how to proceed. The group's thoughts caused each of the group members to keep an eye on each other to see who would be the first to act. Perhaps the majority of the group members were under the influence of a mind guard and conformity pressure (Forsyth, 1990). Though most of them expressed strong feelings for Edward, their feelings were impractical because none of them seemed to act on their feelings.
The group's first move is to blame Marian. Instead of figuring out how to solve the problem, the group begins with a heated blame game. Others, some believe, must have prompted Marian's actions. Others believe Marian was not meant for Edward, while others blame fate. Another group believes Marian must be found and the wedding must be rescheduled. All of the evidence points to the fact that Marian was to be found.
Loafing in Public
When the entire story is examined, the group is thought to have accomplished very little. When the search becomes complicated, the majority of the group members find themselves in a quandary. Jackson is the only one who comes to their aid. The search's failure can be attributed to social loafing. In this case, group members initially assumed Marian was in the neighborhood (American Psychological Association, 1997). Marian appears to have moved further than they anticipated, much to their dismay. The search appeared to be more difficult and appealing. The search will only yield results if all members put forth consistent effort.
However, as new challenges emerge, the members of the group gradually withdraw their efforts. They only exert their efforts via phone calls, each of which confirms their support essay writing services reddit . At the end of the day, the bridegroom, Edward, is the only one who matters. As the search becomes more complicated, the group members lose interest. The majority of the participants are unwilling to give their all because they see the search as a group effort. Because the matter is handled by a group, it is clear that each group member's energy is not being fully utilized (Murdoch, 1996). It is also clear that if group members had acted individually, the search for Marian would have gone much more smoothly.
Social Collapse
In this case, social implosion does not involve a smaller group, but rather one person acting as an individual in the effort to help the entire group. As previously stated, the search causes confusion among all group members, with some reducing their contribution. Some come up with crazy ideas, while others choose to abandon the search. Others, such as Edward and close allies, are completely dissatisfied with Marian's disappearance (Forsyth, 1990). Jackson must separate himself from the group mentality and devise mechanisms to assist the other members.
Despite the fact that he is the least respected member of the group, his contribution cannot be overstated. It is clear that he plays a significant role in improving group cohesion. Furthermore, he serves as a motivator for many of the group's demoralized members. Given that most of the people in the group were becoming desperate with the search, his departure from the entire group was deliberate (American Psychological Association, 1997). His vitality contributes to the search's vigor. Jackson is a huge help to Edward, who is devastated by Marian's disappearance. As a result, Jackson may not be considered a split group, but rather a necessary split that improves the group's effectiveness.
Deindividuation
As the search intensifies, deindividuation is visible throughout the plot. The group members appear to lose self-awareness as a result of the intensity of the search. One could argue that Jackson breaks away from the group mentality in order to help the group regain its self-consciousness (Forsyth, 1990). As the situation becomes more complicated, the group becomes more emotional and less regulated. The search becomes futile as many members leave, of course. Some, like Edward, become more sensitive to the problem, which causes him to become more emotionally destabilized (Murdoch, 1997). There is an urgent need for someone to intervene and assist the group in regaining its focus. When there is a lack of self-regulation, there is a decrease in group cohesiveness, which weakens the search process.
New Group Consideration
Though the new groupmind may appear to be a late occurrence, it is the factor that helped the group re-unite. Jackson is responsible for the emergence and development of the new groupthink. The emergence of new groupthink marked a significant turning point in the search process. The new groupthink brought people together and improved cohesion (American Psychological Association, 1997). The group's most recent failure was primarily due to the processes discussed above. The majority of these processes had a negative impact on the group, and the only positive aspect that favors the search is new groupthink. The new groupthink, thanks to Jackson, played a significant role in finding Marian. Marian was eventually found in London thanks to her creativity and cohesion. Marian, on the other hand, was no longer willing to marry Edward (Forsyth, 1990). Despite the fact that the search had caused tremendous pain among the group members, it was eventually viewed as a waste of time.
How the Group Processes Affected the "Problem" Outcome
Based on the preceding experiences, group processes were on the verge of paralyzing the search. Because of the group mentality, the group members were less committed to the search, as previously stated. Each group member hoped that the other person would act as a result of the mentality. Furthermore, the search took too long because many group members lost their self-consciousness about the issue (Forsyth, 1990). Things change, however, when Jackson acts as an individual with the goal of uniting the group and increasing self-awareness. Jackson makes a significant contribution to the members' ability to address both emotional and real issues. Members became more focused and creative as their self-awareness increased (Murdoch, 1996). As a result, the members concentrated on strategies that would yield significant results. The search was intensified as a result of the collaborative effort, and Marian was found. Though Marian is no longer in love with Edward, it is clear that the group's main goal of finding her was met.
References
The American Psychological Association (APA) (1997). The dynamics of groups. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
D. R. Forsyth and D. R. Forsyth (1990). The dynamics of groups. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California.
I. Murdoch (1996). Jackson's predicament Viking, New York.
Process of Negotiation
Negotiation is a commonplace process that occurs in a variety of settings. It is used to ensure that one obtains what he or she desires. Negotiation determines one's success because simple negotiation skills can help one amass vast fortunes. People with strong negotiating skills are known to be market leaders all over the world. Negotiation is not determined by a person's level of education or background. It is heavily influenced by the knowledge of a few tricks of a successful negotiation process.
Good negotiation skills ensure that a person receives what others are offering simply by employing simple, convincing tactics. As previously stated, negotiation is a daily ongoing process that occurs at various levels. It is a common phenomenon in many fields, including manufacturing and supply, the contraction industry, sales and marketing, and the real estate sector. Negotiation skills distinguish the amount of pay offered to different employees within the same organization. They decide who should and should not be given a discount. Various companies competing for a government contract will employ every negotiation tactic known to ensure that they get the best deal possible. In short, it is clear that simple negotiating skills can be used to obtain what the other is offering. The persuasive power of excellent negotiation skills can be used to obtain the best offer. Good negotiation skills ensure that a person obtains the best deals with the least amount of effort. As a result, it is necessary for someone to employ excellent negotiation strategies in order to gain the upper hand in each contract being negotiated.
Prior to the negotiation process, conduct research on potential negotiating strategies.
Before entering into a negotiation, it is necessary to have a thorough understanding of the client with whom one is meeting. This prior knowledge is required because it aids in the efficient planning of the negotiation process. Knowing the nature of the client mentally prepares one, which may improve negotiating skills. It enables one to understand what is expected of the contract, and it is critical to understand how the client handled previous contracts. This information can be used to determine the required offer and the level of adjustments. It also aids in understanding the client's terms and conditions by referring to previous contracts. With this information, one can be certain of getting the best deal possible (Nierenberg Oregon State Bar, 25). This would give you an advantage over competitors who would not spend time researching their clients.
To obtain diverse information about government negotiators and government operations, the negotiation team would need to conduct extensive research. This research would aid in understanding the nature and characteristics of state negotiators as well as the state. Various research approaches, including quantitative research, qualitative research, a pragmatic approach, and a participatory approach, would be used in this project.
Quantitative Methodology
This method would be used to collect data about the state and its negotiators and convert it into numbers or a numerical form. Numbers would then aid in reaching a firm conclusion. The negotiating team would come up with one or more hypotheses, which are questions that would guide the research. These inquiries would take the form of predictions about the state and previous contracts (Nierenberg Oregon State Bar, 25). The negotiating team must conduct various tests to verify the truth in order to obtain the answers. This procedure would employ various data collection methods, including statistical analysis. These methods would seek to establish a link between a number of independent variables, such as state and total revenue allocated to specific projects. These methods would also consider the population size of the target group as well as the effects of the project.
This approach would be guided by objectivity, and the negotiators' attitudes, views, and perceptions should not influence the outcome. The negotiation team's interests should not create any level of impartiality. This procedure ensures that the researchers measure what they are supposed to measure. This procedure also ensures that all external factors and elements that may have an impact on the results are under control.
Methodology of Qualitative Research
This approach is linked to the current reality of social aspects. This study would be useful in analyzing and comprehending the nature of the state's negotiators. This is due to the fact that it seeks to investigate and learn about the deeper meanings of human behavior. It is useful for analyzing people's emotions, beliefs, and experiences. It would be the best method for understanding human behavior with this understanding.
One of the most important requirements in a negotiation process is an understanding of human behavior. It will be simple to plan how to approach the person you are dealing with once you have a good understanding of him or her. Because the primary goal of the process is to comprehend the data collected, it is usually inductive. This approach, in contrast to the quantitative approach, attempts to move from specific facts to general facts. It focuses on the truth that lies beneath the predetermined hypotheses about human behavior.
A Practical Approach
This process does not have a specific design or data collection criteria. It is highly dependent on the situation at hand because it provides a guideline for the process to follow. This would allow the negotiators to use whatever method they saw fit for the situation. This approach recognizes the shortcomings of various research methods and seeks to supplement them all. The ability to use a variety of techniques at the same time is the best part about this process.
Competitors and differentiating features
There can be no negotiation if there are no potential competitors. There are other organizations that have driverless
convoys that transport goods and supplies. However, it is always a good idea to conduct preliminary research cheapest essay writing service reddit on the nature of the goods and services offered by competitors. There are three competitors in this field that have been producing driverless convoys. Their convoys are nearly identical in nature, despite the fact that they are powered by different sources of energy. The convoys in two of the companies are powered by gasoline. This means that, in addition to the initial cost of the convoy, there is always an additional cost for gasoline. This also implies that these convoys will be unable to operate if gasoline becomes scarce. These convoys also necessitate frequent maintenance because gasoline engines depreciate at a faster rate.
The other competitor has an electrically powered convoy. One thing to keep in mind is that this convoy lacks backup power. This means that if there is a power outage, this device will not function. It is also obvious that this convoy is only effective in areas with a consistent supply of electricity. In addition to the initial cost of the convoy, there is a critical concern about the cost of electric power.
This company's convoy has a strong selling point in terms of price, power, and pollution. When compared to what the competitors are offering, the convoy on offer is inexpensive. Given that it can use both electricity and solar energy, the initial and ongoing costs are reasonable. It also has a continuous power backup in case of a power outage. The backup battery can operate for up to twelve hours without needing to be recharged. The convoy is environmentally friendly because it emits no smoke. It is also built with readily available parts that are readily available locally in the event of a repair. All of these elements give this company an advantage over its competitors.
Steps to Take When Starting a Negotiation
A negotiation process necessitates careful planning ahead of time. The goals and objectives should be defined, as well as the strategies that will increase the chances of success. The following steps should be taken to ensure a successful negotiation:
Negotiation Preparation
There are a few issues that should be addressed before beginning the negotiation process. The negotiating team should establish specific goals and objectives. This should be expressed in terms of the expected outcome's minimum, maximum, and average levels. If the negotiation fails, there should be a backup plan. The negotiating team should establish the firm's and the state's needs. There should be a clearly written agenda outlining what will be discussed, who will be present, the location, time, and date. The negotiating team should also practice the entire negotiation process thoroughly (Dawson, 1995).
Negotiating with the Government's Representatives
The members of the negotiating team must become acquainted with one another in order to establish agendas. The team should then make their first offer, followed by the state's proposal. It's important for the team to remember that it's not a good idea to accept the state's first offer. The state's proposal should be scrutinized, and all issues should be clarified while keeping the firm's objectives in mind. Given the government's stance, the firm should have several offers. However, both parties should be flexible enough so as to reach a consensus. Any closing signals should be noted by the negotiating team (Canada, 20). Once a consensus has been reached, the agreement should be put in writing, followed by the closing remarks.
Negotiation Strategies to Use
The strategy and technique to be used are determined by the nature of the client and competitors. This is determined by the client's and competitors' knowledge (Dawson, 1995). To ensure the success of this negotiation process, two strategies would be used:
Solving Issues
The firm's team meets with the state s negotiators best writing services reddit to finalize the contract terms. The state's negotiators lay out their terms and conditions, and the company presents its case (Lamar et al, 27). This entails demonstrating why the company has the best deal. It is a thorough examination of the positive and negative aspects of the electrical-solar driven convoys, with a focus on the long-term sustainability of the entire process.
Conceding
This is primarily accomplished through the application of the best negotiation skills in persuasion. This is not about using exaggeration to present facts that place the company at the top when compared to other firms. It is the actual points of convincing state negotiators that the firm has the best offer (Lamar et al, 27). It entails providing prior evidence of other successful projects completed by the firm. At this point, the benefits of the convoy as well as the unique features are being considered. The company also takes into account the price set by the government in order to achieve the best price per device. This does not necessarily imply that the firm should reduce its production costs in order to win the tender. In a nutshell, this method entails extremely competitive and healthy bargaining between the firm and the state.
Contracts for Negotiation
As previously stated, a negotiation begins with the establishment of specific goals and objectives. These objectives and goals reflect what the firm expects from a contract. As a result, it is prudent to accept and sign contracts that reflect the company's goals. This would ensure that nothing in the company is jeopardized. Any contract that disadvantages the firm will always be detrimental to the firm's future survival. It's also important to remember that there's always another option (Dawson, 1995). Rejecting one offer may always open the door to a different offer from a different company. Due to impartiality, members of the same company should not be allowed to write the contract. For starters, they may be tempted to draft a contract that favors the needs of the business while disregarding the needs of the other party. They may also agree to an unfavorable contract out of fear of losing a client.
During Negotiations, Facial Expressions
During a negotiation, it is always advisable to pay close attention to the other party's facial expressions. Facial expressions are more expressive than words and can help determine how the other party feels about the offer. Gestures and different facial expressions reveal a person's inner thoughts and feelings. Several body languages, such as a client appearing disturbed or uncomfortable during a negotiation, should be closely monitored. This could indicate that he or she is uneasy. Physical appearance, as well as physical contact, should be evaluated. Eye contact can also reveal whether or not a client is interested in your offer. Facial expressions can reveal a client's level of interest and when he or she agrees to the proposal. Finally, the client's posture can indicate his or her level of interest or disinterest (Dawson, 1995).
Conclusion
Negotiations occur in everyday life, and the parties involved should always be prepared to negotiate. The methods of negotiation used can have a significant impact on the outcome. People who are skilled negotiators always get the best deals. A negotiation process should be planned and researched for best results. This aids in getting to know the other party and getting everything in order prior to a negotiation. Any negotiation process should always be conducted in the best interests of the company in question. Finally, negotiating parties should pay close attention to the other party's body language.
References
Canada (20). The process of bargaining. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Ottawa.
R. Dawson (1995). Roger Dawson's power negotiating secrets. Career Press, Hawthorne, NJ.
C. Lamar, W. C. Monroe, H. H. Spicker, A. H. Fink, Kentucky Educational Television, and Indiana University, Bloomington (27). The process of bargaining. KET Network Center, Lexington, Kentucky.
G. I. Nierenberg and the Oregon State Bar (25). The negotiation procedure. Oregon State Bar, Committee on Continuing Legal Education, Portland./*
Process Theology
Process theology is recognized as a subset of theology that evolved from Alfred North Whitehead's philosophy (1861-1947).
In fact, process theology has been most specifically elaborated by Charles Hartshorne (1897-20) and John B. Cobb (1925).
Essay writing help
Actually, process theology and process philosophy are referred to collectively as "process thought." The Process Church, on the other hand, is unrelated to process theology. In fact, it is because of the process thought that people understand that God is not all-powerful in the traditional sense of a compulsive being. Furthermore, reality is made up of serially disposed occurrences that are empirical in nature, rather than material matters that outlast time. Furthermore, the universe is highlighted by the envoys of free will's actings and alterations. Everything in the universe, not just humans, engages in self-regulation and identity formation. God, humanity, and other creatures can all co-create. As a result, God is unable to compel anything to happen, but rather influences the implementation of this global free will by proposing a variety of possibilities and aspects. As a result, it is critical to comprehend the sources and origins of Alfred Whitehead's thoughts. Second, it is important to understand why the process of thinking is valuable for theology as a whole in this era of radical thinking. Finally, it is critical to determine whether this synthesis of philosophy and theology provides a solid foundation for comprehending and interpreting the Christian faith.
In fact, the origins of process thought, like the majority of Western philosophy, can be traced back to the Greeks. Heraclitus appears to be the most ancient and venerable of the particularly "process" speculators (Bowman McDaniel, 26). Unfortunately, the concepts and ideas of Heraclitus and his contemporary Parmenides are only available to humanity in a few fragments, and these fragments only provide people with an allusion and suggestion of their thoughts (Middleton, 22). It is known that Heraclitus observed that a human being cannot "step into the same river twice" (because the water has already flown down adrift by the time one steps into it the second time), and thus the foundation of reality has been altered (Bowman McDaniel, 26, p. 165). In fact, the speculation was diametrically opposed to Parmenides' belief and demonstration in his poem about nature that, in fact, "being" preceded "becoming," and that incumbent every change was some more fundamental reality that sustained. According to a critical reading of history, Parmenides appeared to be the father of metaphysics and the foundations of later Greek philosophy, while Heraclitus was severely underappreciated (Middleton, 22). As a result, the impetus of Greek thought, and subsequently the majority of Western thought, was steamed from the immutable ideas and concepts of "being," "matter," and "subsistence," rather than the more emergent and dynamical concepts and ideas of "becoming," "proceeding" and "progress," "development," and "evolution" (Bowman McDaniel, 26).
Actually, understanding the major ideas and concepts of the process thought as such is critical. The first concept asserts that God is not all-powerful in the sense of being obligatory. Indeed, the celestial and divine possess the strength and capacity of conviction rather than compulsion. Thus, it is the process, which theologians regard as the classic dogma of all-power, while incorporating violence and primus inter pares (controversially crosswise). Furthermore, the same theologians have declared it to be more limited than traditional dogma (Mesle Cobb, 1993). The second concept demonstrates that reality is created not only from material matters that endure over time, but also from systematically ordered occurrences and events that are experiential and empirical in nature. The third concept demonstrates how the universe and macrocosm are featured through the acting and alterations performed by free will proponents. In fact, self-identification pervades everything in the macrocosm, not just humanity (Bowman McDaniel, 26). As a result, God cannot overpower or compel anything to happen, but can only influence the existence of this macrocosmic free will by proposing and suggesting various possibilities and aspects (Mesle Cobb, 1993). The fourth concept holds that God includes the macrocosm and universe but is not the same as the universe (this is also known as panentheism) (Bowman McDaniel, 26). The fifth idea demonstrates that, despite the fact that God includes an ever-changing universe, this does not imply that God is constant and variable (meaning that God is influenced by the operations and actions that occur throughout the universe) over the entire period of time. Nonetheless, the abstract constituents of God, such as kindness, prudence, and so on, remain immutably profound and fundamental (Mesle Cobb, 1993). The final conception demonstrates that humanity does not have a private (or individual) eternity, but it does not imply that people do not have an unprejudiced eternity in that their sophistication lives on for all eternity in God, who includes all of it (Middleton, 22).
On the other hand, it is critical to pay attention to the ideas developed by Albert Whitehead himself. Whitehead's classical assertion is a collection of antithetic denunciations that attempt to avoid self-divergence by hovering them from a combination of inverses into a contrast (Bowman McDaniel, 26).
The first Albert Whitehead concept states that it is equally true to say that God is constant and the universe flows, as it is to say that the universe is constant and God is changeable. The second idea demonstrates that it is just as true to say that God is single and there are many universes as it is to say that there is only one universe and many Gods. The third concept demonstrates that it is just as true to say that God is genuine exceedingly in comparison to the universe as it is to say that the universe is genuine enormously in comparison to God (Mesle Cobb, 1993). According to the fourth conception, believing that the universe is inherent in God is just as true as believing that God is inherent in the universe. The fifth idea shows that it is just as true to say that God transgresses and excels the universe as it is to say that the universe transgresses God. The final concept demonstrates that it is just as true to say that God originates and creates the universe as it is to say that God originates and creates the universe (Middleton, 22).
All of these apprehensions lead to dipolar theism, which is the belief that the apprehension of an ideal God cannot be limited to a specific set of characteristics, because perfection can be incarnated in the obnoxious characteristics. For example, in order for God to be perfect, God cannot have complete dominion over all beings because God would not be as kind as a being who is stimulated by instigation rather than ruthless strength (Middleton, 22). As a result, for God to be ideal, he must be both vigorous and retain the limited strength of other beings to oppose God's inducement.
In fact, opponents harshly criticize every philosophy or religion. Process thought is heavily criticized in today's world because it is so aggressive. As a result, it is critical to comprehend the reasons for criticism. Actually, it is well known that process theology or process thought deals effectively with issues of evil (meaning theodicy), and as a result, it is sometimes criticized for making this task too simple (Cobb Griffin, 1976). It is believed that the possibility of evil cannot be eliminated without the complete requirement of independent mediation (Bowman McDaniel, 26). It is obvious that God may be held ultimately accountable; however, the only alternative stands for the possibility of not having a polysemic world. As a result, the eternal and inherent God, who feels each anguish and contentment more precisely than humans do, will obviously fondle, modify, and preserve everything that God is capable of doing. The most common critique of the process thought from Christian conservatives and evangelicals is that the process apprehension of God too harshly mitigates God's strength (Middleton, 22). Process theologians argue that God does not have a one-linear, mandatory rule over everything in the universe. In process thought, or process theology, God is not capable of ignoring an individual's independence, nor of performing wonderments that actually disregard natural laws, nor of performing material operations such as provoking or stopping a deluge or a billow (Cobb Griffin, 1976). Critics argue that this fear saps sacred strength and vigor to the point where God is no longer honorable and worshipful (Mesle Cobb, 1993).
Nonetheless, the process thought repercussion of this critique demonstrates that the traditional Christian apprehension of God is intrinsically not worshipful and honorable at this time, and that the conventional concept of God's almightiness does not actually make sense (Mesle Cobb, 1993). To begin with, strength and almightiness are relative concepts. To speculate that some entity (in this case, God) is capable of constantly effectually governing and managing any other entity is to conclude, in effect, that the other entity does not exist as a separate and distinct being in any notional or significant sense. It is possible because there is no chance of it resisting the preceding entity (meaning God) if it chooses to infuse the issue (Bowman McDaniel, 26).
With this in mind, process theologians make a number of critical distinctions between various types of authority and vigor. The first distinction is between "compulsory" and "convincing" authority. Compulsory authority is exercised by one physical being over another, such as when a billiard ball strikes another or one arm twists another arm. Inanimate objects (including billiard balls) are incapable of resisting such a use of material authority, and even animate beings (including arms) are only capable of resisting until then, and thus can be compelled to submit (Mesle Cobb, 1993). While being restricted, physical beings are able to detect compulsory authority over one another in the above-mentioned way, God due to the fact of lacking a physical body, is unable (not solely will not) to demonstrate compulsory authority over the universe (Middleton, 22). (Middleton, 22).
Nevertheless
, process theologians reddit essay writing services debate that compulsory authority is practically a subordinate or derived type of authority, while conviction is the primary type. Even the process of self-movement (for example, of an arm) is regarded as an example of conviction authority (Cobb Griffin, 1976). This is explained by the fact that the arm may not function as desired because it may be fractured or otherwise incapable of performing the desired operation. Only after the convictive acting of self-movement is effective can a whole being begin to impose compulsory authority over other confined physical bodies or objects. However, no amount of coercive authority can alter other beings' independent decisions and choices (Bowman McDaniel, 26). However, only convictive actions are capable of doing so. While process theologians argue that God does not have compulsory authority, they also argue that God has supreme convictive authority, and thus God is constantly influencing and persuading people to choose the good.
To conclude, it is important to mention that the sources and origins of the ideas provided by Alfred Whitehead are old and fundamental. Since the current world is so cruel, people try to find the solutions of various aggressive behavior with the help of philosophy and religion. Process thought explained that despite the fact that there are two types of authority, meaning compulsory and convincing, God utilizes convincing authority, as this is a primary type. Thus, the process thought is valuable for the theology as such in this era of radical thinking, as it helps to interpret and comprehend the Christian faith.
References
Bowman, D., McDaniel, J. (Eds.). (26). Handbook of process theology. Danvers, MA: Chalice Press.
Cobb, J., Griffin, D. (1976). Process theology: An introductory exposition. London: The Westminster Press.
Mesle, R., Cobb, J. (1993). Process theology. Danvers, MA: Chalice Press.
Middleton, D. (Ed.). (22). God, literature, and process thought. Farnham: Ashgate.
References:
https://sensationaltheme.com/forums/users/stevecarter/
https://rpmrush24.com/read-blog/11257
https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/bon/comment/view/1256/0/7658
https://redsocialgoool.com/read-blog/43547
